Circulation Dynamics and Dilution in Shallow Estuaries Case Study (1): Dilution Factor Calculations

Oto-Obong Akpan; Kelly Francisco; Robert Miskewitz

doi:10.32908/JMEE.v11.2024111601

Authors

Oto-Obong Akpan Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey, 500 Bartholomew Dr, Piscataway; NJ; 08854, United States Author
Kelly Francisco Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation, Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey, 100 Brett Rd, Piscataway; NJ; 08854, United States Author
Robert Miskewitz Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey, 500 Bartholomew Dr, Piscataway; NJ; 08854, United States Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32908/JMEE.v11.2024111601

Keywords:

Effluent Plume Transport, WWTPs, CORMIX, Dilution Factor, Water Quality

Abstract

The ambient conditions of receiving waters such as currents and density stratification influence the dilution of treated wastewater discharged by WWTPs. Hendrix Creek, a semi-enclosed tidal tributary of Jamaica Bay that serves as receiving water of the 26th Ward WRRF, is not well studied. A near-field dilution model was developed and applied to the plant outfall to simulate plume transport and dilution in the initial mixing zone. The long-term ambient field conditions were characterized, and the dilution factor of a tracer was measured to calibrate the model. This was phase one of an integrated dilution and mixing study aimed at understanding the circulation dynamics which contribute to dilution in the creek. Field measurements during the dye release period also aided in the calibration and development of a 3D hydrodynamic model used to accomplish far-field dilution and mixing in phase two of this study. The near-field model results have good agreement with dye survey data and acoustic doppler current profiler (ADCP) measurements in the creek. Under critical conditions, the model predicts a dilution factor of less than 2 in the initial mixing zone, indicating poor dilution. Saline water from Jamaica Bay which served to dilute the treated wastewater appears to be dominated by the high plant discharge resulting in limited dilution in the near-field region of the creek.

References

Baumgartner, D. J., Frick, W. E., & Roberts, P. J. (1994). Dilution models for effluent discharges. US Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA/600/R-94/086, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

Benotti, M., Abbene, M., & Terracciano, S. (2005). Nitrogen Loading in Jamaica Bay. Long Island: U.S Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report.

Blumberg, A. F., & Mellor, G. L. (1987). A Description of a Three-Dimensional Coastal Ocean Model. Three-Dimensional Coastal Ocean Models. Vol. 4, N. Heaps, Ed., American Geophysical Union.

Bureau of Water Resources Management. (1992). Mixing Zone Guidance for Chronic Toxicity and Zones of Initial Dilution. Guidance, Modeling and Analysis Unit, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin.

Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface Water Quality Modeling. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Duncan, S., Solecki, W., & Waldman, J. (2013). Stream Daylighting in NYC: Benefits, Opportunities, Challenges. CUNY Institute for Sustainable Cities (CISC), Earth and Environmental Sciences/Urban Geography, New York.

Dunn, R. J., Zigic, S., & Shiell, G. R. (2014). Modelling the dispersion of treated wastewater in a shallow coastal wind-driven environment, Geographe Bay, Western Australia: implications for environmental management. Environmental monitoring and assessment,, 186(10), 6107-6125.

Fischer, H., List, J., Imberger, J., Koh, C., & Brooks, N. (1979). Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters. Academic Press.

Holzer, P., & Krebs, P. (1998). Modelling the total ammonia impact of CSO and WWTP effluent on the receiving water. Water Science and Technology, 38(10), 31-39.

Hunt, C. D., Mansfield, A. D., Mickelson, M. J., Albro, C. S., Geyer, W. R., & Roberts, P. J. (2010). Plume tracking and dilution of effluent from the Boston sewage outfall. Marine Environmental Research, 70(2), 150-161.

Inan, A. (2019). Modeling of Hydrodynamics and Dilution in Coastal Waters. Water (Basel), 11(1), 83.

Jirka, G. H., & Akar, P. J. (1991). Hydrodynamic Classification of Submerged Multiport-Diffuser Discharges. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(9), 1113-1128.

Jirka, G. H., & Doneker, R. L. (1991). Hydrodynamic Classification of Submerged Single-Port Discharges. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117(9), 1095-1112.

Jones, G. R., Nash, J. D., Doneker, R. L., & Jirka, G. H. (2007). Buoyant Surface Discharges into Water Bodies. I: Flow Classification and Prediction Methodology. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(9), 1010–1020.

Kang, S.-W., Oh, B.-C., Park, K.-S., & You, S.-H. (1999). Near-field Dilution of Wastewater Effluents Discharged from Submerged Ocean Outfalls in Masan Bay. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 395-405.

Lawler, Matusky & Skelley Engineers. (1994). Final Summary Repor: Attainment Evaluation of the Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Criterion.

Li, Q., Qiao, F., & Yu, L. (2015). Modeling Total Ammonia Nitrogen Concentration: A Case Study in Houston Ship Channel and Upper & Lower Galveston Bay. Journal of Pollution and Control, 3:149.

Li, S., & Hodgins, D. (2010). Modelling wastewater effluent mixing and dispersion in a tidal channel. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering.

Marsooli, R., Orton, P., Fitzpatrick, J., & Smith, H. (2018). Residence Time of Highly Urbanized Estuary: Jamaica Bay, New York. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 6(2), 44.

Morelissen, R., Kaaij, T. V., & Bleninger, T. (2011). Waste Water Discharge Modelling With Dynamically Coupled Near Field and Far Field Models. International Symposium on Outfall Systems. Mar del Plata.

Naidu, V. S. (2013). Estimation of Near-Field and Far-Field Dilutions for Site Selection of Effluent Outfall in a Coastal Region-A Case Study. Journal of Coastal Research, 29(6), 1326-1340.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP). (2009). 2009 Water Quality Report.

New York City Department of Environmental Protection. (2012). Jamaica Bay Waterbody/Watershed Facility Plan Report. New York.

Paulsen, K., Featherstone, J., & Greene, S. (2007). Conservation‐Induced Wastewater Flow Reductions Improve Nitrogen Removal: Evidence from New York City. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(6), 1570-1582.

Roberts, P. J. (1999). Modeling Mamala Bay Outfall Plumes. I: Near Field. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(6), 564-573.

True, E. D. (2018). Using Numerical Model to Track the Discharge of a Wastewater Treatment Plant in a Tidal Estuary. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 229(8), 1-21.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2014). Water Quality Standards Handbook: Chapter 5: General Policies. EPA-823-B-17-001. EPA Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology.

US Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Control. Federal Register, 57(109), p. 24401.